<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Concept Composition with Faceted Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thingsontop.com/concept-composition-with-faceted-search-97.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thingsontop.com/concept-composition-with-faceted-search-97.html</link>
	<description>Search User Experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:22:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 3 Quick Design Patterns for Better Faceted Search &#8211; Things On Top</title>
		<link>http://www.thingsontop.com/concept-composition-with-faceted-search-97.html/comment-page-1/#comment-4490</link>
		<dc:creator>3 Quick Design Patterns for Better Faceted Search &#8211; Things On Top</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchnuggets.no/?p=97#comment-4490</guid>
		<description>[...] support concept composition, allowing users to form idiosyncratic concepts like &#8220;Japanese cars&#8221; or &#8220;Reliable [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] support concept composition, allowing users to form idiosyncratic concepts like &#8220;Japanese cars&#8221; or &#8220;Reliable [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Design Patterns for Ideas and Inspiration - Things On Top</title>
		<link>http://www.thingsontop.com/concept-composition-with-faceted-search-97.html/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Design Patterns for Ideas and Inspiration - Things On Top</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchnuggets.no/?p=97#comment-22</guid>
		<description>[...] are closely related to search applications. Search result filtering is also known as faceted search, a design pattern put into good use on websites like eg. kayak.com and oodle.com. iGoogle is a good [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are closely related to search applications. Search result filtering is also known as faceted search, a design pattern put into good use on websites like eg. kayak.com and oodle.com. iGoogle is a good [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;concept composition&#8221; = multiple attribute selection &#171; Oodles of Design</title>
		<link>http://www.thingsontop.com/concept-composition-with-faceted-search-97.html/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;concept composition&#8221; = multiple attribute selection &#171; Oodles of Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchnuggets.no/?p=97#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] info  By zuzka   Categories: 1                     This article on Searchnuggets offers a fancily-phrased write-up that (in summary) says that giving users the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] info  By zuzka   Categories: 1                     This article on Searchnuggets offers a fancily-phrased write-up that (in summary) says that giving users the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vegard Sandvold</title>
		<link>http://www.thingsontop.com/concept-composition-with-faceted-search-97.html/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Vegard Sandvold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchnuggets.no/?p=97#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Till. Great reference and valuable insight.

It&#039;s true, I guess, that faceted search won&#039;t let you form attribute-combinations that aren&#039;t lexicalized, since faceted navigation is always restricted to attributes of documents found in the search result. In other words, you can never navigate into zero-hits.

Do you think it&#039;s possible to use concept lattices for search result visualization?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Till. Great reference and valuable insight.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true, I guess, that faceted search won&#8217;t let you form attribute-combinations that aren&#8217;t lexicalized, since faceted navigation is always restricted to attributes of documents found in the search result. In other words, you can never navigate into zero-hits.</p>
<p>Do you think it&#8217;s possible to use concept lattices for search result visualization?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Till C. Lech</title>
		<link>http://www.thingsontop.com/concept-composition-with-faceted-search-97.html/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Till C. Lech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchnuggets.no/?p=97#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with you, Vegard. Concept Composition is a cool, uhm, concept.

In search for your reference on this, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_concept_analysis&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Formal Concept Analysis (FCA)&lt;/a&gt; is a very nice framework for looking at concept spaces and exploring combinations of properties that are determinant for a concept. In short, FCA implies that a concept is constituted by a set of binary attributes.

A concept space is thus constituted by a matrix of objects and attributes. Imagine attributes such as &quot;acidic&quot;, &quot;round&quot;, &quot;oval&quot;, &quot;yellow&quot;, and &quot;orange&quot; as a set of properties (attributes) to determine a bunch of fruits (objects).  By applying (i.e. combining) them, we have a way of telling e.g. a lemon from a grapefruit or orange.

What&#039;s really nice about FCA is the fact that you can &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.upriss.org.uk/fca/example.jpg&quot; title=&quot;concept matrices and lattices&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;visualize the matrix as a concept lattice&lt;/a&gt; thus providing a nice tool for exploring concept spaces: You can easily see which attribute-combinations constitute an object and (maybe even more important) what attribute-combinations are not lexicalized, i.e. do not have a name of their own. In my example, we&#039;d see that the acidic fruits could be called something like citrus-fruits, while oval fruits (or yellow ones) do not have a name per se.

Combining the available concepts beforehand and see how combinations are (or are not) realized could be really useful for search - for example when it comes to avoiding unfavorable zero-hit experiences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with you, Vegard. Concept Composition is a cool, uhm, concept.</p>
<p>In search for your reference on this, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_concept_analysis" rel="nofollow">Formal Concept Analysis (FCA)</a> is a very nice framework for looking at concept spaces and exploring combinations of properties that are determinant for a concept. In short, FCA implies that a concept is constituted by a set of binary attributes.</p>
<p>A concept space is thus constituted by a matrix of objects and attributes. Imagine attributes such as &#8220;acidic&#8221;, &#8220;round&#8221;, &#8220;oval&#8221;, &#8220;yellow&#8221;, and &#8220;orange&#8221; as a set of properties (attributes) to determine a bunch of fruits (objects).  By applying (i.e. combining) them, we have a way of telling e.g. a lemon from a grapefruit or orange.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s really nice about FCA is the fact that you can <a href="http://www.upriss.org.uk/fca/example.jpg" title="concept matrices and lattices" rel="nofollow">visualize the matrix as a concept lattice</a> thus providing a nice tool for exploring concept spaces: You can easily see which attribute-combinations constitute an object and (maybe even more important) what attribute-combinations are not lexicalized, i.e. do not have a name of their own. In my example, we&#8217;d see that the acidic fruits could be called something like citrus-fruits, while oval fruits (or yellow ones) do not have a name per se.</p>
<p>Combining the available concepts beforehand and see how combinations are (or are not) realized could be really useful for search &#8211; for example when it comes to avoiding unfavorable zero-hit experiences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

